Heist Pipeline

The Grilling

Phase 2 — Adversarial debate between proposer and devil's advocate to surface risks and edge cases.

The Grilling

Phase 2 of the Heist Pipeline

Adversarial brainstorming — a structured debate between a Proposer and a Devil's Advocate to surface risks, edge cases, and trade-offs that single-perspective design misses.

Skill: gangsta:the-grillingSkill type: Flexible — debate depth adapts to feature complexity

Purpose: Challenge assumptions before committing to a design. It's better to find weaknesses through debate than through production failures.

Process

The Grilling uses multi-agent debate:

  1. Proposer presents — One agent argues for the best approach based on the Dossier
  2. Devil's Advocate challenges — Another agent attacks every assumption, identifies risks, and proposes alternatives
  3. Multiple rounds — The debate continues through several rounds until positions stabilize
  4. Consensus formation — Areas of agreement and disagreement are documented
  5. Produce Grilling Conclusions — Formal documentation of the outcome

Output: Grilling Conclusions

The Grilling Conclusions document contains:

  • Key Decisions — What was agreed upon and why
  • Rejected Alternatives — Approaches considered and rejected, with reasoning
  • Unresolved Objections — Disagreements that couldn't be settled (escalated to Don)
  • Risk Assessment — Identified risks with severity and mitigation strategies

Phase Gate

Grilling File

The Grilling produces conclusions at:

docs/gangsta/{heist-name}/specs/{date}-contract.md

The conclusions are incorporated into the Contract during The Sit-Down.

Checklist Before Proceeding

  • All major design approaches debated
  • Risks identified and documented
  • Alternatives considered and either accepted or rejected with reasoning
  • Unresolved objections escalated to Don
  • Consensus approved by Don

Previous: Reconnaissance ← | Next: The Sit-Down →

Copyright © 2026